maple tree: be called trees

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents deciduous tree
Weight: 0.78
, tree
Weight: 0.77
, hardwood
Weight: 0.57
, thing
Weight: 0.55
Siblings cherry tree
Weight: 0.42
, fruit tree
Weight: 0.42
, oak tree
Weight: 0.42
, apple tree
Weight: 0.42

Related properties

Property Similarity
be called trees 1.00
be called maple trees 0.88

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.65
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(tree, be called trees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(maple tree, be called trees)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(maple tree, be called trees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(tree, be called trees)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(maple tree, be called trees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(tree, be called trees)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(tree, be called trees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(maple tree, be called trees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(maple tree, be called trees)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(maple tree, be called trees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(maple tree, be called trees)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(maple tree, be called trees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(maple tree, be called maple trees)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(maple tree, be called trees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(maple tree, be called maple trees)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(maple tree, be called trees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(maple tree, be called maple trees)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(maple tree, be called trees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(maple tree, be called maple trees)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(maple tree, be called trees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(maple tree, be called trees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(maple tree, be called trees)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(maple tree, be called trees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(maple tree, be called trees)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(maple tree, be called trees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(tree, be called trees)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(maple tree, be called trees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(tree, be called trees)