maple: is burning wood

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents hardwood
Weight: 0.74
, deciduous tree
Weight: 0.70
, tree
Weight: 0.65
, species
Weight: 0.64
, flavor
Weight: 0.63
Siblings maple tree
Weight: 0.41
, birch
Weight: 0.39
, oak tree
Weight: 0.38
, mahogany
Weight: 0.38
, oak
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
is burning wood 1.00
is poor burning wood 0.96
is wood 0.90
is good wood 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(maple, is burning wood)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(oak, is wood)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(maple, is burning wood)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(oak, is good wood)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(maple, is burning wood)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(oak, is wood)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(oak, is wood)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(maple, is burning wood)
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(oak, is good wood)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(oak, is good wood)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(maple, is burning wood)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(maple, is burning wood)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(maple, is burning wood)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(maple, is wood)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(maple, is burning wood)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(maple, is wood)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(maple, is burning wood)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(maple, is poor burning wood)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(maple, is burning wood)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(maple, is good wood)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(maple, is burning wood)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(maple, is wood)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(maple, is burning wood)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(maple, is wood)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(maple, is burning wood)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(maple, is good wood)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(maple, is burning wood)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(maple, is poor burning wood)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(maple, is burning wood)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(maple, is good wood)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(maple, is burning wood)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(maple, is poor burning wood)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(maple, is burning wood)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(maple, is good wood)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(maple, is burning wood)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(maple, is poor burning wood)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(maple, is burning wood)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(maple, is burning wood)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(maple, is burning wood)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(maple, is burning wood)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(maple, is burning wood)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(maple, is burning wood)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(oak, is wood)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(maple, is burning wood)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(oak, is good wood)