maple: zone

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents hardwood
Weight: 0.74
, deciduous tree
Weight: 0.70
, tree
Weight: 0.65
, species
Weight: 0.64
, flavor
Weight: 0.63
Siblings maple tree
Weight: 0.41
, birch
Weight: 0.39
, oak tree
Weight: 0.38
, mahogany
Weight: 0.38
, oak
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
zone 1.00
has physical part zone 0.91

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(maple, zone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(oak tree, has physical part zone)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(maple, zone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(maple tree, has physical part zone)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(maple, zone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(oak tree, has physical part zone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(oak tree, has physical part zone)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(maple, zone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(maple tree, has physical part zone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(maple tree, has physical part zone)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(maple, zone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(maple, zone)

Similarity expansion

0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(maple, zone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(maple, has physical part zone)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(maple, zone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(maple, has physical part zone)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(maple, zone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(maple, has physical part zone)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(maple, zone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(maple, has physical part zone)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(maple, zone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(maple, zone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(maple, zone)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(maple, zone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(maple, zone)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(maple, zone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(oak tree, has physical part zone)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(maple, zone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(maple tree, has physical part zone)