mar: be visible in night sky

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents place
Weight: 0.62
, planet
Weight: 0.55
, brand
Weight: 0.51
, world
Weight: 0.51
, thing
Weight: 0.51
Siblings stoke
Weight: 0.32
, miss
Weight: 0.31
, mexico city
Weight: 0.31
, shanghai
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be visible in night sky 1.00
be visible at night 0.90
is visible 0.84
go backwards in sky 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.16
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(planet, be visible at night)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(mar, be visible in night sky)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(mar, be visible in night sky)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(planet, be visible at night)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.51
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(mar, be visible in night sky)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(planet, be visible at night)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.23
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(planet, be visible at night)
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(mar, be visible in night sky)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(mar, be visible in night sky)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(mar, be visible in night sky)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(mar, be visible in night sky)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(mar, be visible in night sky)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(mar, is visible)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(mar, be visible in night sky)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(mar, be visible at night)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(mar, be visible in night sky)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(mar, go backwards in sky)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(mar, be visible in night sky)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(mar, is visible)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(mar, be visible in night sky)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(mar, be visible at night)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(mar, be visible in night sky)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(mar, be visible in night sky)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(mar, be visible in night sky)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(mar, be visible in night sky)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(mar, be visible in night sky)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(mar, be visible in night sky)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(planet, be visible at night)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(mar, be visible in night sky)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(planet, be visible at night)