mark: be represented by lion

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents record
Weight: 0.65
, leader
Weight: 0.60
, place
Weight: 0.60
, feature
Weight: 0.59
Siblings accent mark
Weight: 0.63
, signature
Weight: 0.62
, line
Weight: 0.61
, sign
Weight: 0.60
, symbol
Weight: 0.59

Related properties

Property Similarity
be represented by lion 1.00
is lion 0.90
be depicted as lion 0.89
is winged lion 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(mark, be represented by lion)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(symbol, is lion)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(mark, be represented by lion)
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(symbol, is lion)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(symbol, is lion)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(mark, be represented by lion)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(mark, be represented by lion)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(mark, be represented by lion)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(mark, be depicted as lion)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(mark, be represented by lion)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(mark, be depicted as lion)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(mark, be represented by lion)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(mark, is lion)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(mark, be represented by lion)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(mark, be depicted as lion)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(mark, be represented by lion)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(mark, is lion)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(mark, be represented by lion)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(mark, is lion)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(mark, be represented by lion)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(mark, be depicted as lion)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(mark, be represented by lion)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(mark, is lion)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(mark, be represented by lion)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(mark, be represented by lion)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(mark, be represented by lion)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(mark, be represented by lion)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(mark, be represented by lion)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(mark, be represented by lion)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(symbol, is lion)