marker: bleed through paper

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents substance
Weight: 0.57
, material
Weight: 0.56
, device
Weight: 0.55
, time
Weight: 0.55
Siblings blood
Weight: 0.60
, pen
Weight: 0.57
, tattoo
Weight: 0.55
, sharpie
Weight: 0.54

Related properties

Property Similarity
bleed through paper 1.00
bleed 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(marker, bleed through paper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(pen, bleed)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(marker, bleed through paper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(tattoo, bleed)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(marker, bleed through paper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(tattoo, bleed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(tattoo, bleed)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(marker, bleed through paper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(pen, bleed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(pen, bleed)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(marker, bleed through paper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(marker, bleed through paper)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(marker, bleed through paper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(marker, bleed)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(marker, bleed through paper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(marker, bleed)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(marker, bleed through paper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(marker, bleed)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(marker, bleed through paper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(marker, bleed)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(marker, bleed through paper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(marker, bleed through paper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(marker, bleed through paper)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(marker, bleed through paper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(marker, bleed through paper)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(marker, bleed through paper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(tattoo, bleed)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(marker, bleed through paper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(pen, bleed)