marker: have aroma

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents substance
Weight: 0.57
, material
Weight: 0.56
, device
Weight: 0.55
, time
Weight: 0.55
Siblings blood
Weight: 0.60
, pen
Weight: 0.57
, tattoo
Weight: 0.55
, sharpie
Weight: 0.54

Related properties

Property Similarity
have aroma 1.00
have pleasing aroma 0.94
smell good 0.83
smell bad 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(marker, have aroma)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(marker, have aroma)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(marker, have aroma)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(marker, smell bad)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(marker, have aroma)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(marker, smell bad)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(marker, have aroma)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(marker, smell bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(marker, have aroma)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(marker, have pleasing aroma)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(marker, have aroma)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(marker, smell bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(marker, have aroma)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(marker, have pleasing aroma)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(marker, have aroma)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(marker, smell good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(marker, have aroma)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(marker, have pleasing aroma)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(marker, have aroma)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(marker, have pleasing aroma)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(marker, have aroma)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(marker, smell good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(marker, have aroma)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(marker, smell good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(marker, have aroma)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(marker, smell good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(marker, have aroma)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(marker, have aroma)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(marker, have aroma)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(marker, have aroma)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(marker, have aroma)