marmite: be delicious

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents brand
Weight: 0.51
, yeast
Weight: 0.50
, product
Weight: 0.45
, stuff
Weight: 0.44
Siblings pepsi
Weight: 0.32
, oreo
Weight: 0.32
, guinness
Weight: 0.31
, saturn
Weight: 0.31
, kleenex
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be delicious 1.00
be tasty and good 0.91

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(marmite, be delicious) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(pepsi, be tasty and good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(marmite, be delicious) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(pepsi, be tasty and good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(pepsi, be tasty and good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.11
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(marmite, be delicious) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(marmite, be delicious)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(marmite, be delicious) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(marmite, be delicious) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(marmite, be delicious)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(marmite, be delicious) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(marmite, be delicious)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(marmite, be delicious) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(pepsi, be tasty and good)