marmot: be at cage

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.56
, wildlife
Weight: 0.50
, bird
Weight: 0.49
, rodent
Weight: 0.49
, company
Weight: 0.48
Siblings groundhog
Weight: 0.60
, grizzly bear
Weight: 0.35
, cougar
Weight: 0.35
, coyote
Weight: 0.34
, beaver
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at cage 1.00
be out of cage 0.97
be lock up in cage 0.90
from empty cage 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(bird, be out of cage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(marmot, be at cage)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(bird, be at cage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(marmot, be at cage)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(marmot, be at cage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(bird, be at cage)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(marmot, be at cage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(bird, be out of cage)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.54
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(marmot, be at cage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(bird, be at cage)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(marmot, be at cage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(bird, be out of cage)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(bird, be at cage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(marmot, be at cage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(marmot, be at cage)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(bird, be out of cage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(marmot, be at cage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(marmot, be at cage)

Salient implies Plausible

0.15
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(marmot, be at cage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(marmot, be at cage)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(marmot, be at cage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(marmot, be at cage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(marmot, be at cage)

Typical implies Plausible

0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(marmot, be at cage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(marmot, be at cage)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(marmot, be at cage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(bird, be out of cage)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(marmot, be at cage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(bird, be at cage)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(marmot, be at cage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(bird, be at cage)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(marmot, be at cage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(bird, be out of cage)