marmot: be at fur coat

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.56
, wildlife
Weight: 0.50
, bird
Weight: 0.49
, rodent
Weight: 0.49
, company
Weight: 0.48
Siblings groundhog
Weight: 0.60
, grizzly bear
Weight: 0.35
, cougar
Weight: 0.35
, coyote
Weight: 0.34
, beaver
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at fur coat 1.00
be used to make fur coat 0.99
be used to provide fur coat 0.97
be used to fur 0.93
has fur 0.92
has feather not fur 0.87
be at fur trap 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(animal, be used to make fur coat)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(marmot, be at fur coat)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(animal, has fur)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(marmot, be at fur coat)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(bird, has feather not fur)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(marmot, be at fur coat)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(marmot, be at fur coat)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(animal, be used to make fur coat)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(marmot, be at fur coat)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(animal, has fur)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(marmot, be at fur coat)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(bird, has feather not fur)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.51
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(marmot, be at fur coat)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(animal, be used to make fur coat)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(marmot, be at fur coat)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(bird, has feather not fur)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(marmot, be at fur coat)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(animal, has fur)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(marmot, be at fur coat)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(beaver, be at fur trap)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(animal, be used to make fur coat)
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(marmot, be at fur coat)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(marmot, be at fur coat)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(animal, has fur)
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(marmot, be at fur coat)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(marmot, be at fur coat)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(bird, has feather not fur)
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(marmot, be at fur coat)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(marmot, be at fur coat)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(marmot, be at fur coat)
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(beaver, be at fur trap)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(beaver, be at fur trap)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(marmot, be at fur coat)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(marmot, be at fur coat)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(marmot, be at fur coat)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(marmot, be at fur coat)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(marmot, be at fur coat)

Typical implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(marmot, be at fur coat)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(marmot, be at fur coat)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(marmot, be at fur coat)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(animal, be used to make fur coat)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(marmot, be at fur coat)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(animal, has fur)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(marmot, be at fur coat)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(bird, has feather not fur)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(marmot, be at fur coat)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(beaver, be at fur trap)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(marmot, be at fur coat)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(animal, be used to make fur coat)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(marmot, be at fur coat)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(animal, has fur)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(marmot, be at fur coat)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(bird, has feather not fur)