marmot: be at hole in grind

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.56
, wildlife
Weight: 0.50
, bird
Weight: 0.49
, rodent
Weight: 0.49
, company
Weight: 0.48
Siblings groundhog
Weight: 0.60
, grizzly bear
Weight: 0.35
, cougar
Weight: 0.35
, coyote
Weight: 0.34
, beaver
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at hole in grind 1.00
be at grind 0.88
live in hole 0.87
be at burrow in grind 0.82
be at hole in stream bank 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(rodent, live in hole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(marmot, be at hole in grind)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(marmot, be at hole in grind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(rodent, live in hole)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(marmot, be at hole in grind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(rodent, live in hole)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(rodent, live in hole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(marmot, be at hole in grind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(marmot, be at hole in grind)

Salient implies Plausible

0.14
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(marmot, be at hole in grind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(marmot, be at hole in grind)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(marmot, be at hole in grind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(marmot, be at burrow in grind)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(marmot, be at hole in grind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(marmot, be at grind)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(marmot, be at hole in grind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(marmot, be at grind)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(marmot, be at hole in grind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(marmot, be at burrow in grind)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(marmot, be at hole in grind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(marmot, be at grind)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(marmot, be at hole in grind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(marmot, be at grind)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(marmot, be at hole in grind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(marmot, be at burrow in grind)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(marmot, be at hole in grind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(marmot, be at burrow in grind)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(marmot, be at hole in grind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(marmot, be at hole in grind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(marmot, be at hole in grind)

Typical implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(marmot, be at hole in grind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(marmot, be at hole in grind)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(marmot, be at hole in grind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(rodent, live in hole)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(marmot, be at hole in grind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(rodent, live in hole)