marmot: be at tree

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.56
, wildlife
Weight: 0.50
, bird
Weight: 0.49
, rodent
Weight: 0.49
, company
Weight: 0.48
Siblings groundhog
Weight: 0.60
, grizzly bear
Weight: 0.35
, cougar
Weight: 0.35
, coyote
Weight: 0.34
, beaver
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at tree 1.00
be find in tree 0.95
live in tree 0.92
be at branch of tree 0.90
be at on branch of tree 0.90
land on tree 0.90
sit on tree 0.89
stand on branch of tree 0.87
be stand on top of tree 0.86
be perch on tree 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(bird, be at tree) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(marmot, be at tree)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(bird, live in tree) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(marmot, be at tree)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(bird, be at on branch of tree) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(marmot, be at tree)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(bird, stand on branch of tree) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(marmot, be at tree)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(marmot, be at tree) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(bird, be at tree)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(marmot, be at tree) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(bird, live in tree)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(marmot, be at tree) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(bird, be at on branch of tree)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(marmot, be at tree) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(bird, stand on branch of tree)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(marmot, be at tree) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(bird, be at tree)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(marmot, be at tree) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(bird, stand on branch of tree)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(marmot, be at tree) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(bird, live in tree)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(marmot, be at tree) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(bird, be at on branch of tree)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(bird, be at tree) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(marmot, be at tree) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(marmot, be at tree)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(bird, live in tree) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(marmot, be at tree) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(marmot, be at tree)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(bird, be at on branch of tree) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(marmot, be at tree) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(marmot, be at tree)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(bird, stand on branch of tree) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(marmot, be at tree) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(marmot, be at tree)

Salient implies Plausible

0.13
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(marmot, be at tree) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(marmot, be at tree)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(marmot, be at tree) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(marmot, be at tree) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(marmot, be at tree)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(marmot, be at tree) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(marmot, be at tree)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(marmot, be at tree) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(bird, be at tree)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(marmot, be at tree) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(bird, be at on branch of tree)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(marmot, be at tree) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(bird, live in tree)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(marmot, be at tree) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(bird, stand on branch of tree)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(marmot, be at tree) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(bird, be at tree)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(marmot, be at tree) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(bird, be at on branch of tree)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(marmot, be at tree) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(bird, live in tree)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(marmot, be at tree) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(bird, stand on branch of tree)