marmot: be at unite state

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.56
, wildlife
Weight: 0.50
, bird
Weight: 0.49
, rodent
Weight: 0.49
, company
Weight: 0.48
Siblings groundhog
Weight: 0.60
, grizzly bear
Weight: 0.35
, cougar
Weight: 0.35
, coyote
Weight: 0.34
, beaver
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at unite state 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(marmot, be at unite state)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(beaver, be at unite state)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(marmot, be at unite state)
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(beaver, be at unite state)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(beaver, be at unite state)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(marmot, be at unite state)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(marmot, be at unite state)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(marmot, be at unite state)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(marmot, be at unite state)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(marmot, be at unite state)

Typical implies Plausible

0.09
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(marmot, be at unite state)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(marmot, be at unite state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(marmot, be at unite state)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(beaver, be at unite state)