marmot: be at wood pile

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.56
, wildlife
Weight: 0.50
, bird
Weight: 0.49
, rodent
Weight: 0.49
, company
Weight: 0.48
Siblings groundhog
Weight: 0.60
, grizzly bear
Weight: 0.35
, cougar
Weight: 0.35
, coyote
Weight: 0.34
, beaver
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at wood pile 1.00
be at wood 0.87
be at wood near stream 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(marmot, be at wood pile) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(beaver, be at wood)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(marmot, be at wood pile) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(beaver, be at wood near stream)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(marmot, be at wood pile) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(beaver, be at wood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(beaver, be at wood)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(marmot, be at wood pile) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(beaver, be at wood near stream) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(beaver, be at wood near stream)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(marmot, be at wood pile) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(marmot, be at wood pile)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(marmot, be at wood pile) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(marmot, be at wood)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(marmot, be at wood pile) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(marmot, be at wood)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(marmot, be at wood pile) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(marmot, be at wood)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(marmot, be at wood pile) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(marmot, be at wood)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(marmot, be at wood pile) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(marmot, be at wood pile) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(marmot, be at wood pile)

Typical implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(marmot, be at wood pile) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(marmot, be at wood pile)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(marmot, be at wood pile) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(beaver, be at wood)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(marmot, be at wood pile) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(beaver, be at wood near stream)