marsh: be at low-lying area

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents habitat
Weight: 0.64
, shallow water
Weight: 0.64
, lake
Weight: 0.59
, water
Weight: 0.59
, company
Weight: 0.59
Siblings ocean water
Weight: 0.36
, pond
Weight: 0.35
, great salt lake
Weight: 0.35
, sea water
Weight: 0.35
, coral reef
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at low-lying area 1.00
be at rural area 0.84
be at city 0.77
be at suburb 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(lake, be at low-lying area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(marsh, be at low-lying area)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(company, be at city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(marsh, be at low-lying area)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(company, be at suburb) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(marsh, be at low-lying area)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(marsh, be at low-lying area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(lake, be at low-lying area)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(marsh, be at low-lying area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(company, be at suburb)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(marsh, be at low-lying area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(company, be at city)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.55
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(marsh, be at low-lying area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(lake, be at low-lying area)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(marsh, be at low-lying area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(company, be at suburb)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(marsh, be at low-lying area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(company, be at city)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(marsh, be at low-lying area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(pond, be at rural area)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(lake, be at low-lying area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(marsh, be at low-lying area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(marsh, be at low-lying area)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(company, be at city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(marsh, be at low-lying area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(marsh, be at low-lying area)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(company, be at suburb) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(marsh, be at low-lying area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(marsh, be at low-lying area)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(marsh, be at low-lying area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(pond, be at rural area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(pond, be at rural area)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(marsh, be at low-lying area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(marsh, be at low-lying area)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(marsh, be at low-lying area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(marsh, be at low-lying area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(marsh, be at low-lying area)

Typical implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(marsh, be at low-lying area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(marsh, be at low-lying area)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(marsh, be at low-lying area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(lake, be at low-lying area)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(marsh, be at low-lying area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(company, be at city)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(marsh, be at low-lying area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(company, be at suburb)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(marsh, be at low-lying area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(pond, be at rural area)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(marsh, be at low-lying area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(lake, be at low-lying area)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(marsh, be at low-lying area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(company, be at city)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(marsh, be at low-lying area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(company, be at suburb)