marsh: be at wetland

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents habitat
Weight: 0.64
, shallow water
Weight: 0.64
, lake
Weight: 0.59
, water
Weight: 0.59
, company
Weight: 0.59
Siblings ocean water
Weight: 0.36
, pond
Weight: 0.35
, great salt lake
Weight: 0.35
, sea water
Weight: 0.35
, coral reef
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at wetland 1.00
be habitat for fish 0.83
be at lake 0.80
be at in lake 0.79
be at lake or river 0.79
be used to wildlife 0.79
be find in lake 0.78
be at forest 0.76
be at tributary 0.76
be used to irrigation water livestock aquatic crop and fire control 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(shallow water, be at lake) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(marsh, be at wetland)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(lake, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(marsh, be at wetland)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(marsh, be at wetland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(shallow water, be at lake)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(marsh, be at wetland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(lake, be at forest)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(marsh, be at wetland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(lake, be at forest)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(marsh, be at wetland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(shallow water, be at lake)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(marsh, be at wetland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(pond, be at forest)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(marsh, be at wetland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(pond, be habitat for fish)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(marsh, be at wetland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(pond, be used to irrigation water livestock aquatic crop and fire control)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(shallow water, be at lake) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(marsh, be at wetland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(marsh, be at wetland)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(lake, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(marsh, be at wetland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(marsh, be at wetland)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(marsh, be at wetland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(pond, be habitat for fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(pond, be habitat for fish)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(marsh, be at wetland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(pond, be used to irrigation water livestock aquatic crop and fire control) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(pond, be used to irrigation water livestock aquatic crop and fire control)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(marsh, be at wetland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(pond, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(pond, be at forest)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(marsh, be at wetland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(marsh, be at wetland)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(marsh, be at wetland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(marsh, be used to wildlife)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(marsh, be at wetland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(marsh, be at forest)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(marsh, be at wetland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(marsh, be used to wildlife)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(marsh, be at wetland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(marsh, be at forest)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(marsh, be at wetland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(marsh, be at forest)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(marsh, be at wetland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(marsh, be used to wildlife)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(marsh, be at wetland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(marsh, be used to wildlife)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(marsh, be at wetland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(marsh, be at forest)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(marsh, be at wetland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(marsh, be at wetland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(marsh, be at wetland)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(marsh, be at wetland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(marsh, be at wetland)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(marsh, be at wetland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(shallow water, be at lake)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(marsh, be at wetland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(lake, be at forest)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(marsh, be at wetland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(pond, be at forest)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(marsh, be at wetland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(pond, be habitat for fish)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(marsh, be at wetland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(pond, be used to irrigation water livestock aquatic crop and fire control)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(marsh, be at wetland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(shallow water, be at lake)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(marsh, be at wetland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(lake, be at forest)