:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Property |
Similarity |
hop |
1.00 |
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(marsupial, hop)
⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(kangaroo, hop)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(marsupial, hop)
⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(wallaby, hop)
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(marsupial, hop)
⋁
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(wallaby, hop)
⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(wallaby, hop)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(marsupial, hop)
⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(kangaroo, hop)
⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(kangaroo, hop)
Salient implies Plausible
0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(marsupial, hop)
⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(marsupial, hop)
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
Typical implies Plausible
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(marsupial, hop)
⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(marsupial, hop)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(marsupial, hop)
⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(wallaby, hop)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(marsupial, hop)
⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(kangaroo, hop)