mass: be related to size

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents quantity
Weight: 0.60
, structure
Weight: 0.59
, variable
Weight: 0.58
, activity
Weight: 0.58
, factor
Weight: 0.58
Siblings density
Weight: 0.32
, scale
Weight: 0.32
, business activity
Weight: 0.32
, saturation
Weight: 0.31
, pyramid
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be related to size 1.00
is size dependant property 0.83
be related 0.81
is related 0.81
be related to density 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(structure, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(mass, be related to size)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(variable, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(mass, be related to size)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(factor, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(mass, be related to size)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(activity, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(mass, be related to size)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(mass, be related to size) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(activity, be related)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(mass, be related to size) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(factor, be related)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(mass, be related to size) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(variable, be related)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(mass, be related to size) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(structure, be related)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(mass, be related to size) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(variable, be related)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(mass, be related to size) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(structure, be related)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(mass, be related to size) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(factor, be related)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(mass, be related to size) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(activity, be related)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(mass, be related to size) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(density, be related)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(mass, be related to size) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(scale, be related)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(structure, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(mass, be related to size) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(mass, be related to size)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(variable, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(mass, be related to size) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(mass, be related to size)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(factor, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(mass, be related to size) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(mass, be related to size)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(activity, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(mass, be related to size) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(mass, be related to size)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(mass, be related to size) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(scale, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(scale, be related)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(mass, be related to size) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(density, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(density, be related)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(mass, be related to size) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(mass, be related to size)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(mass, be related to size) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(mass, be related)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(mass, be related to size) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(mass, is related)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(mass, be related to size) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(mass, be related to density)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(mass, be related to size) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(mass, be related to density)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(mass, be related to size) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(mass, be related to density)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(mass, be related to size) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(mass, is related)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(mass, be related to size) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(mass, be related)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(mass, be related to size) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(mass, is related)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(mass, be related to size) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(mass, be related)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(mass, be related to size) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(mass, be related to density)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(mass, be related to size) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(mass, is related)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(mass, be related to size) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(mass, be related)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(mass, be related to size) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(mass, be related to size) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(mass, be related to size)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(mass, be related to size) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(mass, be related to size)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(mass, be related to size) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(activity, be related)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(mass, be related to size) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(factor, be related)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(mass, be related to size) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(variable, be related)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(mass, be related to size) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(structure, be related)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(mass, be related to size) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(scale, be related)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(mass, be related to size) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(density, be related)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(mass, be related to size) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(activity, be related)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(mass, be related to size) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(factor, be related)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(mass, be related to size) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(variable, be related)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(mass, be related to size) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(structure, be related)