massachusetts: be colored on map

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents new york
Weight: 0.66
, new england
Weight: 0.65
, pennsylvania
Weight: 0.63
, connecticut
Weight: 0.59
Siblings new hampshire
Weight: 0.64
, boston
Weight: 0.62
, west virginia
Weight: 0.36
, new york city
Weight: 0.36
, maryland
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be colored on map 1.00
has color blue 0.79
has color white 0.77
is blue state 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(new england, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(massachusetts, be colored on map)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(connecticut, has color blue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(massachusetts, be colored on map)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(connecticut, is blue state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(massachusetts, be colored on map)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(massachusetts, be colored on map) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(connecticut, has color blue)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(massachusetts, be colored on map) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(connecticut, is blue state)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(massachusetts, be colored on map) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(new england, has color white)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, be colored on map) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(new england, has color white)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, be colored on map) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, is blue state)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, be colored on map) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, has color blue)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, be colored on map) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, has color white)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, be colored on map) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(maryland, is blue state)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, be colored on map) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(maryland, has color blue)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(connecticut, has color blue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(massachusetts, be colored on map) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, be colored on map)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(new england, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(massachusetts, be colored on map) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, be colored on map)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(connecticut, is blue state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(massachusetts, be colored on map) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, be colored on map)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(massachusetts, be colored on map) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(maryland, has color blue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(maryland, has color blue)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(massachusetts, be colored on map) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(maryland, is blue state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(maryland, is blue state)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(massachusetts, be colored on map) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(new hampshire, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, has color white)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(massachusetts, be colored on map) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(massachusetts, be colored on map)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(massachusetts, be colored on map) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, has color blue)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(massachusetts, be colored on map) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, has color white)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(massachusetts, be colored on map) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, is blue state)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(massachusetts, be colored on map) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(massachusetts, has color white)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(massachusetts, be colored on map) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(massachusetts, has color blue)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(massachusetts, be colored on map) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, has color white)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(massachusetts, be colored on map) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(massachusetts, is blue state)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(massachusetts, be colored on map) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, has color blue)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(massachusetts, be colored on map) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(massachusetts, has color white)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(massachusetts, be colored on map) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, is blue state)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(massachusetts, be colored on map) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(massachusetts, has color blue)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(massachusetts, be colored on map) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(massachusetts, is blue state)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(massachusetts, be colored on map) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(massachusetts, be colored on map) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, be colored on map)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(massachusetts, be colored on map) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(massachusetts, be colored on map)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, be colored on map) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(connecticut, has color blue)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, be colored on map) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(connecticut, is blue state)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, be colored on map) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(new england, has color white)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, be colored on map) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(maryland, is blue state)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, be colored on map) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(maryland, has color blue)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, be colored on map) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(new hampshire, has color white)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(massachusetts, be colored on map) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(connecticut, has color blue)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(massachusetts, be colored on map) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(connecticut, is blue state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(massachusetts, be colored on map) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(new england, has color white)