massachusetts: be important to history

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents new york
Weight: 0.66
, new england
Weight: 0.65
, pennsylvania
Weight: 0.63
, connecticut
Weight: 0.59
Siblings new hampshire
Weight: 0.64
, boston
Weight: 0.62
, west virginia
Weight: 0.36
, new york city
Weight: 0.36
, maryland
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to history 1.00
be important to american history 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(connecticut, be important to history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(massachusetts, be important to history)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(pennsylvania, be important to american history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(massachusetts, be important to history)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(massachusetts, be important to history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(connecticut, be important to history)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(massachusetts, be important to history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(pennsylvania, be important to american history)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, be important to history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, be important to history)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, be important to history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, be important to american history)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, be important to history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(maryland, be important to history)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(connecticut, be important to history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(massachusetts, be important to history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, be important to history)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(pennsylvania, be important to american history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(massachusetts, be important to history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, be important to history)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(massachusetts, be important to history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(maryland, be important to history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(maryland, be important to history)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(massachusetts, be important to history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(massachusetts, be important to history)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(massachusetts, be important to history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(massachusetts, be important to american history)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(massachusetts, be important to history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(massachusetts, be important to american history)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(massachusetts, be important to history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, be important to american history)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(massachusetts, be important to history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, be important to american history)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(massachusetts, be important to history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(massachusetts, be important to history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, be important to history)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(massachusetts, be important to history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(massachusetts, be important to history)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, be important to history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(pennsylvania, be important to american history)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, be important to history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(connecticut, be important to history)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, be important to history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(maryland, be important to history)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(massachusetts, be important to history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(connecticut, be important to history)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(massachusetts, be important to history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(pennsylvania, be important to american history)