massachusetts: have winters

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents new york
Weight: 0.66
, new england
Weight: 0.65
, pennsylvania
Weight: 0.63
, connecticut
Weight: 0.59
Siblings new hampshire
Weight: 0.64
, boston
Weight: 0.62
, west virginia
Weight: 0.36
, new york city
Weight: 0.36
, maryland
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
have winters 1.00
have snowy winters 0.93

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(new england, have winters) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(massachusetts, have winters)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(massachusetts, have winters) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(new england, have winters)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, have winters) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(new england, have winters)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(new england, have winters) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(massachusetts, have winters) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, have winters)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(massachusetts, have winters) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(massachusetts, have winters)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(massachusetts, have winters) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, have snowy winters)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(massachusetts, have winters) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(massachusetts, have snowy winters)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(massachusetts, have winters) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, have snowy winters)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(massachusetts, have winters) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(massachusetts, have snowy winters)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(massachusetts, have winters) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(massachusetts, have winters) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, have winters)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(massachusetts, have winters) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(massachusetts, have winters)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, have winters) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(new england, have winters)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(massachusetts, have winters) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(new england, have winters)