master: is expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents title
Weight: 0.64
, degree
Weight: 0.62
, teacher
Weight: 0.61
, film
Weight: 0.60
Siblings stephen king
Weight: 0.63
, edward weston
Weight: 0.52
, frank stella
Weight: 0.52
, realist
Weight: 0.36
, instructor
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is expensive 1.00
have expensive packs 0.81
have expensive programs 0.81
is cheap 0.79
be in finance expensive 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(film, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(master, is expensive)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(degree, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(master, is expensive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(master, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(degree, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(master, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(film, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(master, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(degree, is expensive)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(master, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(film, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(film, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(master, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(master, is expensive)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(degree, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(master, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(master, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(master, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(master, is expensive)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(master, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(master, have expensive packs)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(master, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(master, have expensive programs)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(master, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(master, have expensive packs)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(master, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(master, have expensive programs)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(master, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(master, be in finance expensive)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(master, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(master, have expensive packs)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(master, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(master, have expensive programs)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(master, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(master, be in finance expensive)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(master, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(master, be in finance expensive)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(master, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(master, have expensive packs)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(master, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(master, have expensive programs)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(master, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(master, be in finance expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(master, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(master, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(master, is expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(master, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(master, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(master, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(degree, is expensive)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(master, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(film, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(master, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(degree, is expensive)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(master, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(film, is expensive)