materialism: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents ideology
Weight: 0.66
, philosophy
Weight: 0.64
, theory
Weight: 0.57
, issue
Weight: 0.57
, trait
Weight: 0.56
Siblings liberalism
Weight: 0.37
, capitalism
Weight: 0.37
, atheism
Weight: 0.36
, socialism
Weight: 0.35
, political ideology
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
is bad thing 0.79
feel good 0.76
is good thing 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(philosophy, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(materialism, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(materialism, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(philosophy, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(materialism, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(philosophy, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(materialism, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(socialism, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(materialism, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(liberalism, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(materialism, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(capitalism, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(materialism, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(liberalism, is bad thing)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(materialism, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(socialism, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(materialism, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(liberalism, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(materialism, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(capitalism, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(materialism, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(capitalism, is bad thing)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(materialism, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(socialism, is good thing)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(materialism, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(capitalism, is good thing)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(philosophy, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(materialism, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(materialism, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(materialism, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(capitalism, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(capitalism, has quality bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(materialism, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(capitalism, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(capitalism, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(materialism, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(liberalism, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(liberalism, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(materialism, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(socialism, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(socialism, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(materialism, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(liberalism, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(liberalism, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(materialism, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(socialism, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(socialism, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(materialism, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(capitalism, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(capitalism, is bad thing)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(materialism, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(capitalism, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(capitalism, is good thing)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(materialism, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(socialism, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(socialism, is good thing)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(materialism, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(liberalism, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(liberalism, is bad thing)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(materialism, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(materialism, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(materialism, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(materialism, has quality good)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(materialism, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(materialism, has quality good)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(materialism, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(materialism, has quality good)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(materialism, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(materialism, has quality good)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(materialism, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(materialism, is bad thing)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(materialism, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(materialism, is good thing)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(materialism, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(materialism, feel good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(materialism, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(materialism, feel good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(materialism, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(materialism, feel good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(materialism, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(materialism, is bad thing)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(materialism, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(materialism, is good thing)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(materialism, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(materialism, feel good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(materialism, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(materialism, is good thing)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(materialism, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(materialism, is bad thing)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(materialism, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(materialism, is bad thing)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(materialism, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(materialism, is good thing)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(materialism, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(materialism, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(materialism, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(materialism, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(materialism, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(materialism, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(philosophy, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(materialism, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(liberalism, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(materialism, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(liberalism, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(materialism, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(socialism, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(materialism, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(capitalism, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(materialism, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(capitalism, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(materialism, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(capitalism, is good thing)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(materialism, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(socialism, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(materialism, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(socialism, is good thing)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(materialism, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(liberalism, is bad thing)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(materialism, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(capitalism, is bad thing)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(materialism, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(philosophy, has quality good)