math: be hard for people

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents program
Weight: 0.61
, fundamental
Weight: 0.61
, elementary school
Weight: 0.60
, topic
Weight: 0.60
, core
Weight: 0.59
Siblings calculus
Weight: 0.61
, boolean algebra
Weight: 0.34
, kindergarten
Weight: 0.34
, science
Weight: 0.34
, science fiction
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be hard for people 1.00
be hard to people 0.99
be hard for many people 0.96
be hard for most people 0.95
have hard 0.91
be hard for many 0.91
is hard 0.91
be hard for some for others 0.90
be hard for some 0.88
be easy for people 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(math, be hard for people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(kindergarten, is hard)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(math, be hard for people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(calculus, is hard)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(math, be hard for people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(science fiction, is hard)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(math, be hard for people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(science, is hard)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(math, be hard for people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(science fiction, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(science fiction, is hard)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(math, be hard for people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(science, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(science, is hard)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(math, be hard for people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(calculus, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(calculus, is hard)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(math, be hard for people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(kindergarten, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(kindergarten, is hard)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(math, be hard for people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(math, be hard for people)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(math, be hard for people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(math, be hard for most people)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(math, be hard for people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(math, be hard for most people)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(math, be hard for people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(math, is hard)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(math, be hard for people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(math, be hard for some)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(math, be hard for people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(math, is hard)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(math, be hard for people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(math, be hard for some)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(math, be hard for people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(math, be hard for most people)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(math, be hard for people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(math, be hard for most people)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(math, be hard for people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(math, be hard for some)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(math, be hard for people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(math, be hard for some)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(math, be hard for people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(math, is hard)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(math, be hard for people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(math, is hard)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(math, be hard for people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(math, be hard for people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(math, be hard for people)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(math, be hard for people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(math, be hard for people)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(math, be hard for people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(science fiction, is hard)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(math, be hard for people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(calculus, is hard)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(math, be hard for people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(science, is hard)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(math, be hard for people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(kindergarten, is hard)