math: be related to work

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents program
Weight: 0.61
, fundamental
Weight: 0.61
, elementary school
Weight: 0.60
, topic
Weight: 0.60
, core
Weight: 0.59
Siblings calculus
Weight: 0.61
, boolean algebra
Weight: 0.34
, kindergarten
Weight: 0.34
, science
Weight: 0.34
, science fiction
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be related to work 1.00
be related 0.92
work 0.82
be related to nature 0.82
be related to music 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(core, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(math, be related to work)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(core, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(math, be related to work)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(math, be related to work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(core, be related)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(math, be related to work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(core, work)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(math, be related to work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(core, be related)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(math, be related to work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(core, work)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(math, be related to work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(calculus, be related)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(math, be related to work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(science, be related)
0.00
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.02
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(math, be related to work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(calculus, work)
0.00
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.01
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(math, be related to work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(science, work)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(core, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(math, be related to work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(math, be related to work)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(core, work) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(math, be related to work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(math, be related to work)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(math, be related to work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(science, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(science, be related)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(math, be related to work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(calculus, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(calculus, be related)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(math, be related to work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(calculus, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(calculus, work)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(math, be related to work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(science, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(science, work)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(math, be related to work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(math, be related to work)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(math, be related to work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(math, be related)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(math, be related to work) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(math, work)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(math, be related to work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(math, be related to music)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(math, be related to work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(math, work)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(math, be related to work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(math, be related to music)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(math, be related to work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(math, be related)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(math, be related to work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(math, be related to music)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(math, be related to work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(math, work)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(math, be related to work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(math, be related)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(math, be related to work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(math, work)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(math, be related to work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(math, be related to music)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(math, be related to work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(math, be related)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(math, be related to work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(math, be related to work) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(math, be related to work)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(math, be related to work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(math, be related to work)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(math, be related to work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(core, be related)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(math, be related to work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(core, work)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(math, be related to work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(calculus, work)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(math, be related to work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(science, work)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(math, be related to work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(calculus, be related)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(math, be related to work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(science, be related)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(math, be related to work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(core, be related)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(math, be related to work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(core, work)