mathematics: is art

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents science
Weight: 0.73
, computer science
Weight: 0.72
, math
Weight: 0.64
, department
Weight: 0.64
, philosophy
Weight: 0.64
Siblings physics
Weight: 0.37
, quantum physics
Weight: 0.37
, biology
Weight: 0.37
, arithmetic
Weight: 0.37
, metaphysics
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
is art 1.00
be used to art 0.95
be used in art 0.95
be considered art 0.93
be related to art 0.92

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.64
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(math, is art)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(mathematics, is art)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(philosophy, is art)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(mathematics, is art)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(math, be used in art)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(mathematics, is art)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(computer science, be used in art)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(mathematics, is art)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(mathematics, is art)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(computer science, be used in art)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(mathematics, is art)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(philosophy, is art)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(mathematics, is art)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(math, be used in art)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(mathematics, is art)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(math, is art)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, is art)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(computer science, be used in art)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, is art)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(math, is art)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, is art)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(philosophy, is art)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, is art)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(math, be used in art)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(math, is art)
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(mathematics, is art)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(mathematics, is art)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(philosophy, is art)
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(mathematics, is art)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(mathematics, is art)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(math, be used in art)
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(mathematics, is art)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(mathematics, is art)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(computer science, be used in art)
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(mathematics, is art)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(mathematics, is art)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(mathematics, is art)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(mathematics, is art)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(mathematics, is art)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(mathematics, be used in art)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(mathematics, is art)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(mathematics, be used to art)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(mathematics, is art)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, be used to art)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(mathematics, is art)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, be used in art)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(mathematics, is art)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(mathematics, be considered art)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(mathematics, is art)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(mathematics, is art)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, is art)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(mathematics, is art)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(mathematics, is art)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, is art)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(philosophy, is art)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, is art)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(computer science, be used in art)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, is art)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(math, be used in art)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, is art)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(math, is art)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(mathematics, is art)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(philosophy, is art)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(mathematics, is art)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(computer science, be used in art)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(mathematics, is art)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(math, be used in art)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(mathematics, is art)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(math, is art)