mathematics: were based on 60 important

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents science
Weight: 0.73
, computer science
Weight: 0.72
, math
Weight: 0.64
, department
Weight: 0.64
, philosophy
Weight: 0.64
Siblings physics
Weight: 0.37
, quantum physics
Weight: 0.37
, biology
Weight: 0.37
, arithmetic
Weight: 0.37
, metaphysics
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
were based on 60 important 1.00
be important in ab-english 0.79
was important to pythagoras 0.77
be based on powers of ten 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(mathematics, were based on 60 important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(mathematics, were based on 60 important)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(mathematics, were based on 60 important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(mathematics, be based on powers of ten)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(mathematics, were based on 60 important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(mathematics, be important in ab-english)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(mathematics, were based on 60 important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(mathematics, be based on powers of ten)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(mathematics, were based on 60 important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(mathematics, be important in ab-english)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(mathematics, were based on 60 important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(mathematics, was important to pythagoras)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(mathematics, were based on 60 important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(mathematics, be based on powers of ten)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(mathematics, were based on 60 important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(mathematics, be important in ab-english)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(mathematics, were based on 60 important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(mathematics, was important to pythagoras)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(mathematics, were based on 60 important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, was important to pythagoras)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(mathematics, were based on 60 important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(mathematics, was important to pythagoras)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(mathematics, were based on 60 important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, be important in ab-english)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(mathematics, were based on 60 important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, be based on powers of ten)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(mathematics, were based on 60 important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(mathematics, were based on 60 important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, were based on 60 important)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(mathematics, were based on 60 important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(mathematics, were based on 60 important)