:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
Salient implies Plausible
0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(mayor, fund)
⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(mayor, fund)
Similarity expansion
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(mayor, fund)
⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(mayor, make money)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(mayor, fund)
⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(mayor, make money)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(mayor, fund)
⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(mayor, make money)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(mayor, fund)
⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(mayor, make money)
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(mayor, fund)
⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(mayor, fund)
⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(mayor, fund)
Typical implies Plausible
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(mayor, fund)
⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(mayor, fund)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings