mayor: has state election

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents member
Weight: 0.64
, man
Weight: 0.63
, position
Weight: 0.61
, official
Weight: 0.59
Siblings governor
Weight: 0.35
, congressman
Weight: 0.34
, policeman
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state election 1.00
election 0.96
is elected 0.78
is mcginn far behind in polls 0.78
elected 0.77
get elected 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(official, get elected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(mayor, has state election)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(mayor, has state election) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(official, get elected)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(mayor, has state election) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(official, get elected)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(mayor, has state election) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(congressman, get elected)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(official, get elected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(mayor, has state election) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(mayor, has state election)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(mayor, has state election) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(congressman, get elected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(congressman, get elected)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(mayor, has state election) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(mayor, has state election)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(mayor, has state election) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(mayor, election)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(mayor, has state election) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(mayor, election)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(mayor, has state election) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(mayor, election)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(mayor, has state election) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(mayor, is elected)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(mayor, has state election) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(mayor, elected)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(mayor, has state election) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(mayor, is elected)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(mayor, has state election) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(mayor, is mcginn far behind in polls)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(mayor, has state election) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(mayor, elected)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(mayor, has state election) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(mayor, get elected)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(mayor, has state election) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(mayor, is elected)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(mayor, has state election) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(mayor, is mcginn far behind in polls)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(mayor, has state election) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(mayor, elected)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(mayor, has state election) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(mayor, get elected)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(mayor, has state election) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(mayor, is mcginn far behind in polls)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(mayor, has state election) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(mayor, get elected)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(mayor, has state election) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(mayor, election)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(mayor, has state election) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(mayor, is mcginn far behind in polls)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(mayor, has state election) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(mayor, get elected)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(mayor, has state election) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(mayor, is elected)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(mayor, has state election) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(mayor, elected)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(mayor, has state election) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(mayor, has state election) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(mayor, has state election)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(mayor, has state election) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(mayor, has state election)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(mayor, has state election) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(official, get elected)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(mayor, has state election) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(congressman, get elected)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(mayor, has state election) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(official, get elected)