mcdonald: be on mobile hwy

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents food chain
Weight: 0.65
, restaurant
Weight: 0.62
, fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.62
, chain
Weight: 0.62
, fast food chain
Weight: 0.61
Siblings mcdonalds
Weight: 0.37
, italian restaurant
Weight: 0.36
, chinese restaurant
Weight: 0.35
, mexican restaurant
Weight: 0.35
, indian restaurant
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be on mobile hwy 1.00
be on mobile hwy closed 0.97
be on hwy 0.96
be on hwy closed 0.92

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(mcdonald, be on mobile hwy)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(mcdonald, be on mobile hwy)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(mcdonald, be on mobile hwy)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(mcdonald, be on mobile hwy closed)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(mcdonald, be on mobile hwy)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(mcdonald, be on mobile hwy closed)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(mcdonald, be on mobile hwy)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, be on mobile hwy closed)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(mcdonald, be on mobile hwy)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(mcdonald, be on hwy closed)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(mcdonald, be on mobile hwy)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(mcdonald, be on hwy closed)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(mcdonald, be on mobile hwy)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(mcdonald, be on hwy)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(mcdonald, be on mobile hwy)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, be on hwy closed)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(mcdonald, be on mobile hwy)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(mcdonald, be on hwy)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(mcdonald, be on mobile hwy)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, be on hwy)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(mcdonald, be on mobile hwy)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(mcdonald, be on mobile hwy closed)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(mcdonald, be on mobile hwy)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(mcdonald, be on hwy)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(mcdonald, be on mobile hwy)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(mcdonald, be on hwy closed)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(mcdonald, be on mobile hwy)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(mcdonald, be on mobile hwy)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, be on mobile hwy)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(mcdonald, be on mobile hwy)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(mcdonald, be on mobile hwy)