mcdonald: be similar

Related concepts

Parents	food chain Weight: 0.65 , restaurant Weight: 0.62 , fast food restaurant Weight: 0.62 , chain Weight: 0.62 , fast food chain Weight: 0.61
Siblings	mcdonalds Weight: 0.37 , italian restaurant Weight: 0.36 , chinese restaurant Weight: 0.35 , mexican restaurant Weight: 0.35 , indian restaurant Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be similar	1.00
have similar web	0.78
be same	0.78
is same	0.76
be from pond similar	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.40

Plausible(food chain, be similar) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Typical(mcdonald, be similar)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.47

Plausible(food chain, have similar web) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Typical(mcdonald, be similar)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.39

Plausible(food chain, be same) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Typical(mcdonald, be similar)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.52

Plausible(mcdonald, be similar) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Plausible(food chain, be similar)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.52

Plausible(mcdonald, be similar) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Plausible(food chain, be same)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.52

Plausible(mcdonald, be similar) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Plausible(food chain, have similar web)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.25

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, be similar) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Remarkable(food chain, be same)

0.16

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, be similar) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(food chain, be similar)

0.12

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, be similar) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Remarkable(food chain, have similar web)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, be similar) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(chinese restaurant, is same)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.40

Plausible(food chain, be similar) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

Remarkable(mcdonald, be similar) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Plausible(mcdonald, be similar)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.47

Plausible(food chain, have similar web) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

Remarkable(mcdonald, be similar) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Plausible(mcdonald, be similar)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.39

Plausible(food chain, be same) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

Remarkable(mcdonald, be similar) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Plausible(mcdonald, be similar)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.52

Plausible(mcdonald, be similar) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

Remarkable(chinese restaurant, is same) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Plausible(chinese restaurant, is same)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.52

Plausible(mcdonald, be similar) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Salient(mcdonald, be similar)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.70

Salient(mcdonald, be similar) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Typical(mcdonald, be similar) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, be similar)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.52

Plausible(mcdonald, be similar) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Typical(mcdonald, be similar)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, be similar) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Typical(food chain, be similar)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, be similar) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Typical(food chain, have similar web)

0.26

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, be similar) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Typical(food chain, be same)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, be similar) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Typical(chinese restaurant, is same)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.43

Typical(mcdonald, be similar) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Typical(food chain, be similar)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.43

Typical(mcdonald, be similar) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Typical(food chain, have similar web)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.43

Typical(mcdonald, be similar) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Typical(food chain, be same)