mcdonald: has app working

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents food chain
Weight: 0.65
, restaurant
Weight: 0.62
, fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.62
, chain
Weight: 0.62
, fast food chain
Weight: 0.61
Siblings mcdonalds
Weight: 0.37
, italian restaurant
Weight: 0.36
, chinese restaurant
Weight: 0.35
, mexican restaurant
Weight: 0.35
, indian restaurant
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has app working 1.00
has app 0.94
is app 0.92
has app need contacts 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(mcdonald, has app working) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(mcdonald, has app working)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(mcdonald, has app working) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(mcdonald, is app)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(mcdonald, has app working) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(mcdonald, is app)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(mcdonald, has app working) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(mcdonald, is app)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(mcdonald, has app working) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(mcdonald, has app need contacts)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(mcdonald, has app working) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(mcdonald, has app need contacts)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(mcdonald, has app working) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(mcdonald, has app need contacts)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(mcdonald, has app working) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has app need contacts)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(mcdonald, has app working) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, is app)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(mcdonald, has app working) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(mcdonald, has app working) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has app working)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(mcdonald, has app working) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(mcdonald, has app working)