mcdonald: has closing

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents food chain
Weight: 0.65
, restaurant
Weight: 0.62
, fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.62
, chain
Weight: 0.62
, fast food chain
Weight: 0.61
Siblings mcdonalds
Weight: 0.37
, italian restaurant
Weight: 0.36
, chinese restaurant
Weight: 0.35
, mexican restaurant
Weight: 0.35
, indian restaurant
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has closing 1.00
is closed 0.83
is andre closing 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has closing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(chinese restaurant, is closed)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(mcdonald, has closing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(chinese restaurant, is closed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(chinese restaurant, is closed)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(mcdonald, has closing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(mcdonald, has closing)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(mcdonald, has closing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(mcdonald, is closed)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(mcdonald, has closing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(mcdonald, is closed)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(mcdonald, has closing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, is closed)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(mcdonald, has closing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(mcdonald, is closed)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(mcdonald, has closing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(mcdonald, has closing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has closing)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(mcdonald, has closing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(mcdonald, has closing)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has closing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(chinese restaurant, is closed)