mcdonald: has revenue

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents food chain
Weight: 0.65
, restaurant
Weight: 0.62
, fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.62
, chain
Weight: 0.62
, fast food chain
Weight: 0.61
Siblings mcdonalds
Weight: 0.37
, italian restaurant
Weight: 0.36
, chinese restaurant
Weight: 0.35
, mexican restaurant
Weight: 0.35
, indian restaurant
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has revenue 1.00
make profit 0.77
improve sales 0.77
make profit at all 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(restaurant, improve sales) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(mcdonald, has revenue)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(mcdonald, has revenue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(restaurant, improve sales)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has revenue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, improve sales)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has revenue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, make profit)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(restaurant, improve sales) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(mcdonald, has revenue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(mcdonald, has revenue)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(mcdonald, has revenue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(mcdonalds, make profit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(mcdonalds, make profit)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(mcdonald, has revenue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(mcdonald, has revenue)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(mcdonald, has revenue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(mcdonald, has revenue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has revenue)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(mcdonald, has revenue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(mcdonald, has revenue)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has revenue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(restaurant, improve sales)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has revenue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(mcdonalds, make profit)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(mcdonald, has revenue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(restaurant, improve sales)