mcdonald: is iconic

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents food chain
Weight: 0.65
, restaurant
Weight: 0.62
, fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.62
, chain
Weight: 0.62
, fast food chain
Weight: 0.61
Siblings mcdonalds
Weight: 0.37
, italian restaurant
Weight: 0.36
, chinese restaurant
Weight: 0.35
, mexican restaurant
Weight: 0.35
, indian restaurant
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is iconic 1.00
is famous 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(mcdonald, is iconic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(mcdonald, is iconic)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(mcdonald, is iconic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(mcdonald, is famous)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(mcdonald, is iconic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(mcdonald, is famous)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(mcdonald, is iconic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(mcdonald, is famous)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(mcdonald, is iconic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, is famous)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(mcdonald, is iconic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(mcdonald, is iconic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, is iconic)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(mcdonald, is iconic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(mcdonald, is iconic)