mcdonald: keep rejecting

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents food chain
Weight: 0.65
, restaurant
Weight: 0.62
, fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.62
, chain
Weight: 0.62
, fast food chain
Weight: 0.61
Siblings mcdonalds
Weight: 0.37
, italian restaurant
Weight: 0.36
, chinese restaurant
Weight: 0.35
, mexican restaurant
Weight: 0.35
, indian restaurant
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
keep rejecting 1.00
stop accepting 0.79
accept ebt 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(fast food restaurant, accept ebt)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(mcdonald, keep rejecting)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(mcdonald, keep rejecting)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, accept ebt)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, keep rejecting)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, accept ebt)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(fast food restaurant, accept ebt)
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(mcdonald, keep rejecting)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(mcdonald, keep rejecting)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(mcdonald, keep rejecting)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(mcdonald, keep rejecting)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(mcdonald, keep rejecting)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(mcdonald, keep rejecting)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, keep rejecting)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(mcdonald, keep rejecting)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(mcdonald, keep rejecting)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, keep rejecting)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, accept ebt)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(mcdonald, keep rejecting)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, accept ebt)