mcdonald: like drink

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents food chain
Weight: 0.65
, restaurant
Weight: 0.62
, fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.62
, chain
Weight: 0.62
, fast food chain
Weight: 0.61
Siblings mcdonalds
Weight: 0.37
, italian restaurant
Weight: 0.36
, chinese restaurant
Weight: 0.35
, mexican restaurant
Weight: 0.35
, indian restaurant
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
like drink 1.00
is large drink cheaper than medium 0.78
charge tax on drinks 0.77
charge for alcohol 0.77
carry pepsi instead of coca cola 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(restaurant, charge for alcohol) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(mcdonald, like drink)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(mcdonald, like drink) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(restaurant, charge for alcohol)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, like drink) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, charge for alcohol)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(restaurant, charge for alcohol) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(mcdonald, like drink) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(mcdonald, like drink)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(mcdonald, like drink) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(mcdonald, like drink)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(mcdonald, like drink) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(mcdonald, like drink) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, like drink)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(mcdonald, like drink) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(mcdonald, like drink)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, like drink) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(restaurant, charge for alcohol)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(mcdonald, like drink) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(restaurant, charge for alcohol)