mcdonalds: be at rest area

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.73
, fast food chain
Weight: 0.68
, chain
Weight: 0.65
, thing
Weight: 0.63
, brand
Weight: 0.61
Siblings fast food
Weight: 0.35
, pepsi
Weight: 0.35
, hamburger
Weight: 0.34
, toyota
Weight: 0.34
, sherlock holmes
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at rest area 1.00
be at suburban area 0.78
be at any populate area 0.77
be at region 0.76
look small than thing nearby 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(fast food restaurant, be at any populate area)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(mcdonalds, be at rest area)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(thing, look small than thing nearby)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(mcdonalds, be at rest area)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(fast food chain, be at region)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(mcdonalds, be at rest area)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(fast food chain, be at suburban area)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(mcdonalds, be at rest area)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(mcdonalds, be at rest area)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(fast food chain, be at suburban area)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(mcdonalds, be at rest area)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(fast food chain, be at region)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(mcdonalds, be at rest area)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(thing, look small than thing nearby)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(mcdonalds, be at rest area)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, be at any populate area)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, be at rest area)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(fast food chain, be at suburban area)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, be at rest area)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be at any populate area)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, be at rest area)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(fast food chain, be at region)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, be at rest area)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(thing, look small than thing nearby)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.21
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(fast food restaurant, be at any populate area)
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(mcdonalds, be at rest area)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(mcdonalds, be at rest area)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(thing, look small than thing nearby)
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(mcdonalds, be at rest area)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(mcdonalds, be at rest area)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(fast food chain, be at region)
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(mcdonalds, be at rest area)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(mcdonalds, be at rest area)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(fast food chain, be at suburban area)
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(mcdonalds, be at rest area)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(mcdonalds, be at rest area)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(mcdonalds, be at rest area)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(mcdonalds, be at rest area)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(mcdonalds, be at rest area)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(mcdonalds, be at rest area)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, be at rest area)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(mcdonalds, be at rest area)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(mcdonalds, be at rest area)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, be at rest area)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, be at any populate area)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, be at rest area)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(thing, look small than thing nearby)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, be at rest area)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(fast food chain, be at region)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, be at rest area)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(fast food chain, be at suburban area)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(mcdonalds, be at rest area)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, be at any populate area)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(mcdonalds, be at rest area)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(thing, look small than thing nearby)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(mcdonalds, be at rest area)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(fast food chain, be at region)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(mcdonalds, be at rest area)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(fast food chain, be at suburban area)