mcdonalds: taste good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.73
, fast food chain
Weight: 0.68
, food chain
Weight: 0.66
, chain
Weight: 0.65
, thing
Weight: 0.63
Siblings mcdonald
Weight: 0.37
, starbucks
Weight: 0.36
, taco bell
Weight: 0.35
, fast food
Weight: 0.35
, hey
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
taste good 1.00
taste different 0.93
taste better in countries 0.87
pop better taste 0.86
taste better in other countries 0.84
taste everywhere same 0.84
taste different in countries 0.84
taste different in different countries 0.81
taste different in other countries 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, taste good)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(taco bell, taste different)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(mcdonalds, taste good)
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(taco bell, taste different)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(taco bell, taste different)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(mcdonalds, taste good)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(mcdonalds, taste good)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(mcdonalds, taste good)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(mcdonalds, taste different)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(mcdonalds, taste good)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, taste different)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(mcdonalds, taste good)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(mcdonalds, taste different)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(mcdonalds, taste good)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(mcdonalds, taste different)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(mcdonalds, taste good)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(mcdonalds, taste better in other countries)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(mcdonalds, taste good)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, taste better in other countries)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(mcdonalds, taste good)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(mcdonalds, taste different in countries)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(mcdonalds, taste good)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(mcdonalds, taste better in other countries)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(mcdonalds, taste good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(mcdonalds, taste different in different countries)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(mcdonalds, taste good)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, taste different in countries)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(mcdonalds, taste good)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(mcdonalds, taste better in other countries)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(mcdonalds, taste good)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(mcdonalds, taste different in countries)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(mcdonalds, taste good)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(mcdonalds, taste different in countries)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(mcdonalds, taste good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, taste different in different countries)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(mcdonalds, taste good)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(mcdonalds, taste different in different countries)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(mcdonalds, taste good)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(mcdonalds, taste different in different countries)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(mcdonalds, taste good)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(mcdonalds, taste good)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, taste good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(mcdonalds, taste good)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(mcdonalds, taste good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, taste good)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(taco bell, taste different)