meal: be serve in restaurant

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dessert
Weight: 0.66
, event
Weight: 0.60
, person
Weight: 0.59
, accommodation
Weight: 0.59
Siblings soup
Weight: 0.73
, hamburger
Weight: 0.71
, salad
Weight: 0.71
, bacon
Weight: 0.67

Related properties

Property Similarity
be serve in restaurant 1.00
be at fast-food restaurant 0.89
be serve on plate 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(meal, be serve in restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(hamburger, be at fast-food restaurant)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(meal, be serve in restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(hamburger, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(hamburger, be at fast-food restaurant)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(meal, be serve in restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(meal, be serve in restaurant)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(meal, be serve in restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(meal, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(meal, be serve in restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(meal, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(meal, be serve in restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(meal, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(meal, be serve in restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(meal, be serve on plate)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(meal, be serve in restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(meal, be serve on plate)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(meal, be serve in restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(meal, be serve on plate)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(meal, be serve in restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(meal, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(meal, be serve in restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(meal, be serve on plate)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(meal, be serve in restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(meal, be serve in restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(meal, be serve in restaurant)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(meal, be serve in restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(meal, be serve in restaurant)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(meal, be serve in restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(hamburger, be at fast-food restaurant)