mean: be in maths

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents parameter
Weight: 0.64
, term
Weight: 0.59
, word
Weight: 0.58
, moment
Weight: 0.57
Siblings f word
Weight: 0.33
, think
Weight: 0.33
, want
Weight: 0.32
, fuck
Weight: 0.32
, hate
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in maths 1.00
be better than arithmetic 0.77
be different from arithmetic 0.77
be less than arithmetic 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(mean, be in maths)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(mean, be in maths)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(mean, be in maths)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(mean, be less than arithmetic)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(mean, be in maths)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(mean, be better than arithmetic)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(mean, be in maths)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(mean, be different from arithmetic)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(mean, be in maths)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(mean, be better than arithmetic)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(mean, be in maths)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(mean, be less than arithmetic)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(mean, be in maths)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(mean, be less than arithmetic)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(mean, be in maths)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(mean, be better than arithmetic)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(mean, be in maths)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(mean, be different from arithmetic)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(mean, be in maths)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(mean, be different from arithmetic)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(mean, be in maths)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(mean, be different from arithmetic)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(mean, be in maths)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(mean, be better than arithmetic)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(mean, be in maths)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(mean, be less than arithmetic)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(mean, be in maths)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(mean, be in maths)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(mean, be in maths)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(mean, be in maths)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(mean, be in maths)