meat: be cook to kill bacteria in it

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dairy product
Weight: 0.65
, food
Weight: 0.65
, fast food
Weight: 0.63
, raw material
Weight: 0.63
, item
Weight: 0.63
Siblings hamburger
Weight: 0.72
, lamb
Weight: 0.71
, beef
Weight: 0.69
, pork
Weight: 0.68
, tofu
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
be cook to kill bacteria in it 1.00
be cook before it be eat 0.83
be eat cook 0.83
be cook before eat 0.82
be well cook to prevent food poison 0.82
be cook to be safe to eat 0.82
be used to cook 0.81
be cook or uncooked 0.80
be defined as something you can cook and eat 0.80
be cook in kitchen 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(food, be used to cook)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(meat, be cook to kill bacteria in it)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(food, be cook in kitchen)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(meat, be cook to kill bacteria in it)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(meat, be cook to kill bacteria in it)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(food, be cook in kitchen)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(meat, be cook to kill bacteria in it)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(food, be used to cook)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(meat, be cook to kill bacteria in it)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(food, be used to cook)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(meat, be cook to kill bacteria in it)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(food, be cook in kitchen)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(meat, be cook to kill bacteria in it)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(hamburger, be well cook to prevent food poison)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(meat, be cook to kill bacteria in it)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(beef, be cook before it be eat)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(food, be used to cook)
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(meat, be cook to kill bacteria in it)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(meat, be cook to kill bacteria in it)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(food, be cook in kitchen)
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(meat, be cook to kill bacteria in it)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(meat, be cook to kill bacteria in it)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(meat, be cook to kill bacteria in it)
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(hamburger, be well cook to prevent food poison)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(hamburger, be well cook to prevent food poison)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(meat, be cook to kill bacteria in it)
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(beef, be cook before it be eat)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(beef, be cook before it be eat)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(meat, be cook to kill bacteria in it)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(meat, be cook to kill bacteria in it)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(meat, be cook to kill bacteria in it)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(meat, be eat cook)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(meat, be cook to kill bacteria in it)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(meat, be cook before eat)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(meat, be cook to kill bacteria in it)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(meat, be cook to be safe to eat)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(meat, be cook to kill bacteria in it)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(meat, be cook to be safe to eat)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(meat, be cook to kill bacteria in it)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(meat, be cook before eat)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(meat, be cook to kill bacteria in it)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(meat, be cook to be safe to eat)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(meat, be cook to kill bacteria in it)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(meat, be eat cook)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(meat, be cook to kill bacteria in it)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(meat, be cook before eat)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(meat, be cook to kill bacteria in it)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(meat, be eat cook)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(meat, be cook to kill bacteria in it)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(meat, be cook to be safe to eat)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(meat, be cook to kill bacteria in it)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(meat, be eat cook)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(meat, be cook to kill bacteria in it)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(meat, be cook before eat)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(meat, be cook to kill bacteria in it)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(meat, be cook to kill bacteria in it)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(meat, be cook to kill bacteria in it)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(meat, be cook to kill bacteria in it)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(meat, be cook to kill bacteria in it)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(meat, be cook to kill bacteria in it)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(food, be used to cook)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(meat, be cook to kill bacteria in it)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(food, be cook in kitchen)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(meat, be cook to kill bacteria in it)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(beef, be cook before it be eat)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(meat, be cook to kill bacteria in it)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(hamburger, be well cook to prevent food poison)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(meat, be cook to kill bacteria in it)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(food, be used to cook)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(meat, be cook to kill bacteria in it)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(food, be cook in kitchen)