meat: be dead

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dairy product
Weight: 0.65
, food
Weight: 0.65
, fast food
Weight: 0.63
, raw material
Weight: 0.63
, item
Weight: 0.63
Siblings hamburger
Weight: 0.72
, lamb
Weight: 0.71
, beef
Weight: 0.69
, pork
Weight: 0.68
, tofu
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
be dead 1.00
be grind up dead cow 0.81
be defined as flesh of dead animal 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(meat, be dead)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(hamburger, be grind up dead cow)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(meat, be dead)
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(hamburger, be grind up dead cow)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(hamburger, be grind up dead cow)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(meat, be dead)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(meat, be dead)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(meat, be dead)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(meat, be defined as flesh of dead animal)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(meat, be dead)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(meat, be defined as flesh of dead animal)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(meat, be dead)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(meat, be defined as flesh of dead animal)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(meat, be dead)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(meat, be defined as flesh of dead animal)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(meat, be dead)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(meat, be dead)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(meat, be dead)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(meat, be dead)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(meat, be dead)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(meat, be dead)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(hamburger, be grind up dead cow)