meat: be in pie

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dairy product
Weight: 0.65
, frozen food
Weight: 0.65
, food
Weight: 0.65
, fast food
Weight: 0.63
, raw material
Weight: 0.63
Siblings lunch meat
Weight: 0.80
, hamburger
Weight: 0.72
, lamb
Weight: 0.71
, beef
Weight: 0.69
, chicken
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in pie 1.00
is pie 1.00
be in hot pie burn 0.90
be in mincemeat pie 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(meat, be in pie) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(meat, be in pie)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(meat, be in pie) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(meat, is pie)
0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(meat, be in pie) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(meat, is pie)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(meat, be in pie) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(meat, is pie)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(meat, be in pie) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(meat, is pie)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(meat, be in pie) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(meat, be in pie) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(meat, be in pie)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(meat, be in pie) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(meat, be in pie)