meat: has fat

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dairy product
Weight: 0.65
, food
Weight: 0.65
, fast food
Weight: 0.63
, raw material
Weight: 0.63
, item
Weight: 0.63
Siblings hamburger
Weight: 0.72
, lamb
Weight: 0.71
, beef
Weight: 0.69
, pork
Weight: 0.68
, tofu
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
has fat 1.00
be fatty 0.84
be used to get protein in your diet 0.79
has many calorie but few vitamin 0.78
be used to eat protein 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(fast food, be fatty)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(meat, has fat)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(fast food, has many calorie but few vitamin)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(meat, has fat)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(meat, has fat)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(fast food, has many calorie but few vitamin)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(meat, has fat)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(fast food, be fatty)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(meat, has fat)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be fatty)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(meat, has fat)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(fast food, has many calorie but few vitamin)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(fast food, be fatty)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(meat, has fat)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(meat, has fat)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(fast food, has many calorie but few vitamin)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(meat, has fat)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(meat, has fat)

Salient implies Plausible

0.15
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(meat, has fat)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(meat, has fat)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(meat, has fat)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(meat, be used to eat protein)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(meat, has fat)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(meat, be used to get protein in your diet)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(meat, has fat)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(meat, be used to get protein in your diet)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(meat, has fat)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(meat, be used to get protein in your diet)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(meat, has fat)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(meat, be used to get protein in your diet)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(meat, has fat)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(meat, be used to eat protein)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(meat, has fat)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(meat, be used to eat protein)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(meat, has fat)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(meat, be used to eat protein)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(meat, has fat)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(meat, has fat)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(meat, has fat)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(meat, has fat)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(meat, has fat)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(meat, has fat)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(fast food, be fatty)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(meat, has fat)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(fast food, has many calorie but few vitamin)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(meat, has fat)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(fast food, be fatty)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(meat, has fat)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(fast food, has many calorie but few vitamin)