meat: is risk food

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dairy product
Weight: 0.65
, frozen food
Weight: 0.65
, food
Weight: 0.65
, fast food
Weight: 0.63
, raw material
Weight: 0.63
Siblings lunch meat
Weight: 0.80
, hamburger
Weight: 0.72
, lamb
Weight: 0.71
, beef
Weight: 0.69
, chicken
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
is risk food 1.00
is high risk food 0.96
increase risk of heart disease 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(dairy product, is risk food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(meat, is risk food)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(dairy product, is high risk food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(meat, is risk food)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(meat, is risk food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(dairy product, is risk food)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(meat, is risk food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(dairy product, is high risk food)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(meat, is risk food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(dairy product, is high risk food)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(meat, is risk food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(dairy product, is risk food)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(dairy product, is risk food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(meat, is risk food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(meat, is risk food)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(dairy product, is high risk food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(meat, is risk food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(meat, is risk food)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(meat, is risk food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(meat, is risk food)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(meat, is risk food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(meat, is high risk food)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(meat, is risk food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(meat, increase risk of heart disease)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(meat, is risk food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(meat, increase risk of heart disease)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(meat, is risk food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(meat, increase risk of heart disease)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(meat, is risk food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(meat, is high risk food)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(meat, is risk food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(meat, is high risk food)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(meat, is risk food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(meat, is high risk food)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(meat, is risk food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(meat, increase risk of heart disease)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(meat, is risk food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(meat, is risk food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(meat, is risk food)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(meat, is risk food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(meat, is risk food)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(meat, is risk food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(dairy product, is risk food)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(meat, is risk food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(dairy product, is high risk food)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(meat, is risk food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(dairy product, is risk food)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(meat, is risk food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(dairy product, is high risk food)