meat: is unhealthy

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dairy product
Weight: 0.65
, frozen food
Weight: 0.65
, food
Weight: 0.65
, fast food
Weight: 0.63
, raw material
Weight: 0.63
Siblings lunch meat
Weight: 0.80
, hamburger
Weight: 0.72
, lamb
Weight: 0.71
, beef
Weight: 0.69
, chicken
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
is unhealthy 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.64
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(food, is unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(meat, is unhealthy)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(dairy product, is unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(meat, is unhealthy)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(fast food, is unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(meat, is unhealthy)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(meat, is unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(fast food, is unhealthy)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(meat, is unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(dairy product, is unhealthy)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(meat, is unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(food, is unhealthy)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.55
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(meat, is unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(fast food, is unhealthy)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(meat, is unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(dairy product, is unhealthy)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(meat, is unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(food, is unhealthy)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(meat, is unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(hamburger, is unhealthy)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(meat, is unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(lunch meat, is unhealthy)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(food, is unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(meat, is unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(meat, is unhealthy)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(dairy product, is unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(meat, is unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(meat, is unhealthy)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(fast food, is unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(meat, is unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(meat, is unhealthy)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(meat, is unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(hamburger, is unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(hamburger, is unhealthy)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(meat, is unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(lunch meat, is unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(lunch meat, is unhealthy)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(meat, is unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(meat, is unhealthy)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(meat, is unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(meat, is unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(meat, is unhealthy)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(meat, is unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(meat, is unhealthy)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(meat, is unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(fast food, is unhealthy)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(meat, is unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(dairy product, is unhealthy)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(meat, is unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(food, is unhealthy)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(meat, is unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(hamburger, is unhealthy)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(meat, is unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(lunch meat, is unhealthy)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(meat, is unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(fast food, is unhealthy)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(meat, is unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(dairy product, is unhealthy)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(meat, is unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(food, is unhealthy)