meat: rest after cooking

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dairy product
Weight: 0.65
, frozen food
Weight: 0.65
, food
Weight: 0.65
, fast food
Weight: 0.63
, raw material
Weight: 0.63
Siblings lunch meat
Weight: 0.80
, hamburger
Weight: 0.72
, lamb
Weight: 0.71
, beef
Weight: 0.69
, chicken
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
rest after cooking 1.00
weigh less after cooking 0.83
is is thawed before cooking 0.81
cooking of is chemical change 0.80
take longer cook 0.80
have rest 0.80
be cooked 0.76
is cooked 0.76
get in slow cooker 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(meat, rest after cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(beef, be cooked)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(meat, rest after cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(lamb, be cooked)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(meat, rest after cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(beef, be cooked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(beef, be cooked)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(meat, rest after cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(lamb, be cooked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(lamb, be cooked)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(meat, rest after cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(meat, rest after cooking)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(meat, rest after cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(meat, cooking of is chemical change)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(meat, rest after cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(meat, have rest)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(meat, rest after cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(meat, have rest)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(meat, rest after cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(meat, get in slow cooker)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(meat, rest after cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(meat, get in slow cooker)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(meat, rest after cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(meat, rest after cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(meat, rest after cooking)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(meat, rest after cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(meat, rest after cooking)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(meat, rest after cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(beef, be cooked)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(meat, rest after cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(lamb, be cooked)