mechanic: explain why car broke down

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents specialist
Weight: 0.64
, man
Weight: 0.60
, guy
Weight: 0.60
, element
Weight: 0.59
, expert
Weight: 0.59
Siblings carpenter
Weight: 0.35
, old man
Weight: 0.35
, engineer
Weight: 0.34
, foreman
Weight: 0.34
, policeman
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
explain why car broke down 1.00
explain difference to us 0.78
fix break engine of car 0.77
be back down from argument 0.76
say stop 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(expert, explain difference to us)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(mechanic, explain why car broke down)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(mechanic, explain why car broke down)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(expert, explain difference to us)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(mechanic, explain why car broke down)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(expert, explain difference to us)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(mechanic, explain why car broke down)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(engineer, fix break engine of car)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(mechanic, explain why car broke down)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(policeman, say stop)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(expert, explain difference to us)
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(mechanic, explain why car broke down)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(mechanic, explain why car broke down)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(mechanic, explain why car broke down)
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(engineer, fix break engine of car)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(engineer, fix break engine of car)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(mechanic, explain why car broke down)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(policeman, say stop)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(policeman, say stop)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(mechanic, explain why car broke down)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(mechanic, explain why car broke down)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(mechanic, explain why car broke down)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(mechanic, explain why car broke down)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(mechanic, explain why car broke down)

Typical implies Plausible

0.07
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(mechanic, explain why car broke down)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(mechanic, explain why car broke down)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(mechanic, explain why car broke down)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(expert, explain difference to us)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(mechanic, explain why car broke down)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(policeman, say stop)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(mechanic, explain why car broke down)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(engineer, fix break engine of car)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(mechanic, explain why car broke down)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(expert, explain difference to us)