mechanic: true set of wheel

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents specialist
Weight: 0.64
, man
Weight: 0.60
, guy
Weight: 0.60
, element
Weight: 0.59
, expert
Weight: 0.59
Siblings carpenter
Weight: 0.35
, old man
Weight: 0.35
, engineer
Weight: 0.34
, foreman
Weight: 0.34
, policeman
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
true set of wheel 1.00
true your wheel 0.95
change wheel of car 0.85
oil wheel of train 0.78
turn steer wheel 0.78
true board 0.76
true wall 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(mechanic, true set of wheel)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(engineer, oil wheel of train)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(mechanic, true set of wheel)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(carpenter, true wall)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(mechanic, true set of wheel)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(carpenter, true board)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(mechanic, true set of wheel)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(carpenter, true board)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(carpenter, true board)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(mechanic, true set of wheel)
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(engineer, oil wheel of train)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(engineer, oil wheel of train)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(mechanic, true set of wheel)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(carpenter, true wall)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(carpenter, true wall)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(mechanic, true set of wheel)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(mechanic, true set of wheel)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(mechanic, true set of wheel)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(mechanic, true your wheel)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(mechanic, true set of wheel)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(mechanic, change wheel of car)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(mechanic, true set of wheel)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(mechanic, true your wheel)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(mechanic, true set of wheel)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(mechanic, true your wheel)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(mechanic, true set of wheel)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(mechanic, true your wheel)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(mechanic, true set of wheel)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(mechanic, change wheel of car)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(mechanic, true set of wheel)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(mechanic, change wheel of car)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(mechanic, true set of wheel)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(mechanic, change wheel of car)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(mechanic, true set of wheel)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(mechanic, true set of wheel)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(mechanic, true set of wheel)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(mechanic, true set of wheel)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(mechanic, true set of wheel)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(mechanic, true set of wheel)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(carpenter, true board)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(mechanic, true set of wheel)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(engineer, oil wheel of train)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(mechanic, true set of wheel)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(carpenter, true wall)